Questions about \"boosted\" vs \"NA\" ma

Hybrid96EK · Post by **Hybrid96EK** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:07 pm

Other then adding support for posative manifold pressure, are there significant differences in the code for a \"boosted\" map vs an \"N/A\" map? I ask because I couldn't get my car to cruise correctly without it leaning out horribly once the O2 was enabled. I was on a \"Boosted\" map I made using an omni 3 bar, only the car didn't have turbo yet. I was thinking more or less ahead and figured I could tune the N/A portion and just leave the boosted tables alone until the turbo was on... Anyways, I tried a lot of stuff, nothing seemed to solve my problems. I made a new map today with the stock map sensor and \"N/A\" selected this time. Everything seems to work fine now.. I was wondering if there is something different in the maps other then the obvious additional columns that would help explain this.

Hybrid96EK · Post by **Hybrid96EK** » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:38 pm

Well after a few days of driving things SEEMED to be good. Then today on the way home things were acting up again. I noticed when the car starts missing, I could \"shake\" the ECU on the floor and get the problem to go away. Was pretty obvious at that point I had a loose wire in my conversion harness. I traced it down to a loose CYP sensor wire. After I resoldered it I went for a drive. Idle is a lot lower and so far no missing. I will drive for a few days on the stock map, no other changes before I call it fixed. I'll keep you guys posted.